Merge pull request #1045 from JohnStarich/feature/include-excludes
Re-enable default excludes by ID
This commit is contained in:
commit
4a3e9fd2bb
20
README.md
20
README.md
@ -546,34 +546,34 @@ Flags:
|
||||
--fast Run only fast linters from enabled linters set (first run won't be fast)
|
||||
-e, --exclude strings Exclude issue by regexp
|
||||
--exclude-use-default Use or not use default excludes:
|
||||
# errcheck: Almost all programs ignore errors on these functions and in most cases it's ok
|
||||
# EXC0001 errcheck: Almost all programs ignore errors on these functions and in most cases it's ok
|
||||
- Error return value of .((os\.)?std(out|err)\..*|.*Close|.*Flush|os\.Remove(All)?|.*printf?|os\.(Un)?Setenv). is not checked
|
||||
|
||||
# golint: Annoying issue about not having a comment. The rare codebase has such comments
|
||||
# EXC0002 golint: Annoying issue about not having a comment. The rare codebase has such comments
|
||||
- (comment on exported (method|function|type|const)|should have( a package)? comment|comment should be of the form)
|
||||
|
||||
# golint: False positive when tests are defined in package 'test'
|
||||
# EXC0003 golint: False positive when tests are defined in package 'test'
|
||||
- func name will be used as test\.Test.* by other packages, and that stutters; consider calling this
|
||||
|
||||
# govet: Common false positives
|
||||
# EXC0004 govet: Common false positives
|
||||
- (possible misuse of unsafe.Pointer|should have signature)
|
||||
|
||||
# staticcheck: Developers tend to write in C-style with an explicit 'break' in a 'switch', so it's ok to ignore
|
||||
# EXC0005 staticcheck: Developers tend to write in C-style with an explicit 'break' in a 'switch', so it's ok to ignore
|
||||
- ineffective break statement. Did you mean to break out of the outer loop
|
||||
|
||||
# gosec: Too many false-positives on 'unsafe' usage
|
||||
# EXC0006 gosec: Too many false-positives on 'unsafe' usage
|
||||
- Use of unsafe calls should be audited
|
||||
|
||||
# gosec: Too many false-positives for parametrized shell calls
|
||||
# EXC0007 gosec: Too many false-positives for parametrized shell calls
|
||||
- Subprocess launch(ed with variable|ing should be audited)
|
||||
|
||||
# gosec: Duplicated errcheck checks
|
||||
# EXC0008 gosec: Duplicated errcheck checks
|
||||
- G104
|
||||
|
||||
# gosec: Too many issues in popular repos
|
||||
# EXC0009 gosec: Too many issues in popular repos
|
||||
- (Expect directory permissions to be 0750 or less|Expect file permissions to be 0600 or less)
|
||||
|
||||
# gosec: False positive is triggered by 'src, err := ioutil.ReadFile(filename)'
|
||||
# EXC0010 gosec: False positive is triggered by 'src, err := ioutil.ReadFile(filename)'
|
||||
- Potential file inclusion via variable
|
||||
(default true)
|
||||
--exclude-case-sensitive If set to true exclude and exclude rules regular expressions are case sensitive
|
||||
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ func getDefaultIssueExcludeHelp() string {
|
||||
parts := []string{"Use or not use default excludes:"}
|
||||
for _, ep := range config.DefaultExcludePatterns {
|
||||
parts = append(parts,
|
||||
fmt.Sprintf(" # %s: %s", ep.Linter, ep.Why),
|
||||
fmt.Sprintf(" # %s %s: %s", ep.ID, ep.Linter, ep.Why),
|
||||
fmt.Sprintf(" - %s", color.YellowString(ep.Pattern)),
|
||||
"",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ var OutFormats = []string{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type ExcludePattern struct {
|
||||
ID string
|
||||
Pattern string
|
||||
Linter string
|
||||
Why string
|
||||
@ -37,53 +38,63 @@ type ExcludePattern struct {
|
||||
|
||||
var DefaultExcludePatterns = []ExcludePattern{
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0001",
|
||||
Pattern: "Error return value of .((os\\.)?std(out|err)\\..*|.*Close" +
|
||||
"|.*Flush|os\\.Remove(All)?|.*printf?|os\\.(Un)?Setenv). is not checked",
|
||||
Linter: "errcheck",
|
||||
Why: "Almost all programs ignore errors on these functions and in most cases it's ok",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0002",
|
||||
Pattern: "(comment on exported (method|function|type|const)|" +
|
||||
"should have( a package)? comment|comment should be of the form)",
|
||||
Linter: "golint",
|
||||
Why: "Annoying issue about not having a comment. The rare codebase has such comments",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0003",
|
||||
Pattern: "func name will be used as test\\.Test.* by other packages, and that stutters; consider calling this",
|
||||
Linter: "golint",
|
||||
Why: "False positive when tests are defined in package 'test'",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0004",
|
||||
Pattern: "(possible misuse of unsafe.Pointer|should have signature)",
|
||||
Linter: "govet",
|
||||
Why: "Common false positives",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0005",
|
||||
Pattern: "ineffective break statement. Did you mean to break out of the outer loop",
|
||||
Linter: "staticcheck",
|
||||
Why: "Developers tend to write in C-style with an explicit 'break' in a 'switch', so it's ok to ignore",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0006",
|
||||
Pattern: "Use of unsafe calls should be audited",
|
||||
Linter: "gosec",
|
||||
Why: "Too many false-positives on 'unsafe' usage",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0007",
|
||||
Pattern: "Subprocess launch(ed with variable|ing should be audited)",
|
||||
Linter: "gosec",
|
||||
Why: "Too many false-positives for parametrized shell calls",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0008",
|
||||
Pattern: "G104",
|
||||
Linter: "gosec",
|
||||
Why: "Duplicated errcheck checks",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0009",
|
||||
Pattern: "(Expect directory permissions to be 0750 or less|Expect file permissions to be 0600 or less)",
|
||||
Linter: "gosec",
|
||||
Why: "Too many issues in popular repos",
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
ID: "EXC0010",
|
||||
Pattern: "Potential file inclusion via variable",
|
||||
Linter: "gosec",
|
||||
Why: "False positive is triggered by 'src, err := ioutil.ReadFile(filename)'",
|
||||
@ -91,9 +102,20 @@ var DefaultExcludePatterns = []ExcludePattern{
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func GetDefaultExcludePatternsStrings() []string {
|
||||
return GetExcludePatternsStrings(nil)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func GetExcludePatternsStrings(include []string) []string {
|
||||
includeMap := make(map[string]bool, len(include))
|
||||
for _, inc := range include {
|
||||
includeMap[inc] = true
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var ret []string
|
||||
for _, p := range DefaultExcludePatterns {
|
||||
ret = append(ret, p.Pattern)
|
||||
if !includeMap[p.ID] {
|
||||
ret = append(ret, p.Pattern)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ret
|
||||
@ -411,10 +433,11 @@ func (e ExcludeRule) Validate() error {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
type Issues struct {
|
||||
ExcludeCaseSensitive bool `mapstructure:"exclude-case-sensitive"`
|
||||
ExcludePatterns []string `mapstructure:"exclude"`
|
||||
ExcludeRules []ExcludeRule `mapstructure:"exclude-rules"`
|
||||
UseDefaultExcludes bool `mapstructure:"exclude-use-default"`
|
||||
IncludeDefaultExcludes []string `mapstructure:"include"`
|
||||
ExcludeCaseSensitive bool `mapstructure:"exclude-case-sensitive"`
|
||||
ExcludePatterns []string `mapstructure:"exclude"`
|
||||
ExcludeRules []ExcludeRule `mapstructure:"exclude-rules"`
|
||||
UseDefaultExcludes bool `mapstructure:"exclude-use-default"`
|
||||
|
||||
MaxIssuesPerLinter int `mapstructure:"max-issues-per-linter"`
|
||||
MaxSameIssues int `mapstructure:"max-same-issues"`
|
||||
|
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ func NewRunner(cfg *config.Config, log logutils.Log, goenv *goutil.Env,
|
||||
icfg := cfg.Issues
|
||||
excludePatterns := icfg.ExcludePatterns
|
||||
if icfg.UseDefaultExcludes {
|
||||
excludePatterns = append(excludePatterns, config.GetDefaultExcludePatternsStrings()...)
|
||||
excludePatterns = append(excludePatterns, config.GetExcludePatternsStrings(icfg.IncludeDefaultExcludes)...)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
var excludeTotalPattern string
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user