From 15c75690fcef82b4685b1c6518822140e50b7ac4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Starich <johnstarich@johnstarich.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 14:08:00 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Re-generated README
---
README.md | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 29b1efbf..c2e445cf 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -546,34 +546,34 @@ Flags:
--fast Run only fast linters from enabled linters set (first run won't be fast)
-e, --exclude strings Exclude issue by regexp
--exclude-use-default Use or not use default excludes:
- # errcheck: Almost all programs ignore errors on these functions and in most cases it's ok
+ # EXC0001 errcheck: Almost all programs ignore errors on these functions and in most cases it's ok
- Error return value of .((os\.)?std(out|err)\..*|.*Close|.*Flush|os\.Remove(All)?|.*printf?|os\.(Un)?Setenv). is not checked
- # golint: Annoying issue about not having a comment. The rare codebase has such comments
+ # EXC0002 golint: Annoying issue about not having a comment. The rare codebase has such comments
- (comment on exported (method|function|type|const)|should have( a package)? comment|comment should be of the form)
- # golint: False positive when tests are defined in package 'test'
+ # EXC0003 golint: False positive when tests are defined in package 'test'
- func name will be used as test\.Test.* by other packages, and that stutters; consider calling this
- # govet: Common false positives
+ # EXC0004 govet: Common false positives
- (possible misuse of unsafe.Pointer|should have signature)
- # staticcheck: Developers tend to write in C-style with an explicit 'break' in a 'switch', so it's ok to ignore
+ # EXC0005 staticcheck: Developers tend to write in C-style with an explicit 'break' in a 'switch', so it's ok to ignore
- ineffective break statement. Did you mean to break out of the outer loop
- # gosec: Too many false-positives on 'unsafe' usage
+ # EXC0006 gosec: Too many false-positives on 'unsafe' usage
- Use of unsafe calls should be audited
- # gosec: Too many false-positives for parametrized shell calls
+ # EXC0007 gosec: Too many false-positives for parametrized shell calls
- Subprocess launch(ed with variable|ing should be audited)
- # gosec: Duplicated errcheck checks
+ # EXC0008 gosec: Duplicated errcheck checks
- G104
- # gosec: Too many issues in popular repos
+ # EXC0009 gosec: Too many issues in popular repos
- (Expect directory permissions to be 0750 or less|Expect file permissions to be 0600 or less)
- # gosec: False positive is triggered by 'src, err := ioutil.ReadFile(filename)'
+ # EXC0010 gosec: False positive is triggered by 'src, err := ioutil.ReadFile(filename)'
- Potential file inclusion via variable
(default true)
--exclude-case-sensitive If set to true exclude and exclude rules regular expressions are case sensitive