eeafj/golangci-lint
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases 1 Wiki Activity

Re-generated README

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
John Starich 2020-04-25 14:08:00 -05:00
parent c55e7614d4
commit 15c75690fc
1 changed files with 10 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
README.md
View File

@ -546,34 +546,34 @@ Flags:
--fast Run only fast linters from enabled linters set (first run won't be fast)
-e, --exclude strings Exclude issue by regexp
--exclude-use-default Use or not use default excludes:
# errcheck: Almost all programs ignore errors on these functions and in most cases it's ok
# EXC0001 errcheck: Almost all programs ignore errors on these functions and in most cases it's ok
- Error return value of .((os\.)?std(out|err)\..*|.*Close|.*Flush|os\.Remove(All)?|.*printf?|os\.(Un)?Setenv). is not checked
# golint: Annoying issue about not having a comment. The rare codebase has such comments
# EXC0002 golint: Annoying issue about not having a comment. The rare codebase has such comments
- (comment on exported (method|function|type|const)|should have( a package)? comment|comment should be of the form)
# golint: False positive when tests are defined in package 'test'
# EXC0003 golint: False positive when tests are defined in package 'test'
- func name will be used as test\.Test.* by other packages, and that stutters; consider calling this
# govet: Common false positives
# EXC0004 govet: Common false positives
- (possible misuse of unsafe.Pointer|should have signature)
# staticcheck: Developers tend to write in C-style with an explicit 'break' in a 'switch', so it's ok to ignore
# EXC0005 staticcheck: Developers tend to write in C-style with an explicit 'break' in a 'switch', so it's ok to ignore
- ineffective break statement. Did you mean to break out of the outer loop
# gosec: Too many false-positives on 'unsafe' usage
# EXC0006 gosec: Too many false-positives on 'unsafe' usage
- Use of unsafe calls should be audited
# gosec: Too many false-positives for parametrized shell calls
# EXC0007 gosec: Too many false-positives for parametrized shell calls
- Subprocess launch(ed with variable|ing should be audited)
# gosec: Duplicated errcheck checks
# EXC0008 gosec: Duplicated errcheck checks
- G104
# gosec: Too many issues in popular repos
# EXC0009 gosec: Too many issues in popular repos
- (Expect directory permissions to be 0750 or less|Expect file permissions to be 0600 or less)
# gosec: False positive is triggered by 'src, err := ioutil.ReadFile(filename)'
# EXC0010 gosec: False positive is triggered by 'src, err := ioutil.ReadFile(filename)'
- Potential file inclusion via variable
(default true)
--exclude-case-sensitive If set to true exclude and exclude rules regular expressions are case sensitive